Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > Muting the Alarm over the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

EmailEmail   PrintPrint  

 
"Muting the Alarm over the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict"

AP Photo

"Muting the Alarm over the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict"

The New York Times versus Haaretz, 2000-06

Journal Article, International Security, volume 32, issue 2, pages 84-120

Fall 2007

Author: Jerome Slater

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: International Security; Quarterly Journal: International Security

 

ABSTRACT

The prospects for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remain poor, largely because of Israeli rigidity as well as Palestinian policies and internal conflicts. The United States has failed to use its considerable influence with Israel to seek the necessary changes in Israeli policies, instead providing almost unconditional support. The consequences have been disastrous for the Palestinians, for Israeli security and society, and for critical U.S. national interests in the Middle East. A major explanation for the failure of U.S. policies is the largely uninformed and uncritical mainstream and even elite media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the United States. In contrast, the debate in Israel is more self-critical, vigorous, and far-ranging, creating at least the possibility of change, even as U.S. policy stagnates. A comparison of the coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by the two most prestigious daily newspapers in the United States and Israel—in particular the breakdown of the peace process in 2000 and the ensuing Palestinian intifada, the nature of the Israeli occupation, the problem of violence and terrorism, and the prospects for peace today—underscores these differences. While the New York Times has muted the alarm over the dangers of the United States’ near-unconditional support for Israeli policies toward the Palestinian, Haaretz has sought to sound the alarm.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the IS Editorial Assistant at 617-495-1914.

For Academic Citation:
Jerome Slater. "Muting the Alarm over the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict." The New York Times versus Haaretz, 2000-06. International Security 32 2 (Fall 2007): 84-120.

"Indo-Israeli Relations: Key Security Implications"
By Ronak D. Desai and Xenia Dormandy

Six Years After 9/11
By Rami Khouri

<em>International Security</em>

The Fall 2008 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and Calvert Jones, Sumit Ganguly, S. Paul Kapur, and more.

<em>International Security</em>

The Fall 2008 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni and Calvert Jones, Sumit Ganguly, S. Paul Kapur, and more.

EMAIL UPDATES

Get the latest research on the most important international topics

Sign up to receive updates of the Belfer Center's work on international security, climate change, nuclear issues, the Middle East, or more. Select the topics of your choice.

Human Rights and Wrongs: Slavery, Terror, Genocide

Human Rights and Wrongs explains the persistence of crimes against humanity since the Holocaust...

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past speakers include: Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Abdullah S. Jum'ah, president of Saudi Aramco.

Worst of the Worst: Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations

"This volume makes an unparalleled contribution to the growing and vital field of measurement and human rights. [The book] offers a useful categorization and assessment of repressive and 'rogue' states, allowing us to measure the extenet of repressive state behavior more accurately. His [Rotberg] work should embolden external critiques and facilitate more transparent and accountable foreign policy."

--Sarah Sewall, Director, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard University